Hire Remote Prompt Engineers & LLM Specialists

7 min read
Table of Contents

Hire Prompt Engineers & LLM Specialists Who’ve Shipped Production AI Systems

Your AI prototype worked in a notebook. Production is a different story — hallucinations, latency spikes, retrieval failures, and prompts that degrade after 30 interactions. The prompt engineers and LLM specialists you need have already solved these problems for companies building $10M+ AI products.

We match you with senior prompt engineers who’ve built and shipped production LLM applications for Fortune 500 enterprises and unicorn startups — engineers who understand not just prompting techniques but the full LLM stack: retrieval-augmented generation, fine-tuning, evaluation frameworks, and cost optimization.

Start in days, not months. Pay 50% less than equivalent US-based AI talent.

What Our Prompt Engineers & LLM Specialists Build

Production RAG Systems

Retrieval-augmented generation pipelines on LangChain, LlamaIndex, and custom retrieval stacks — with chunking strategies, embedding model selection, hybrid search, and re-ranking that actually work at production query volumes.

LLM Application Architectures

Multi-turn conversational systems, agent orchestration frameworks, tool-calling pipelines, and structured output extraction — built to be reliable, auditable, and debuggable at scale.

Prompt Engineering & Optimization

Systematic prompt development using chain-of-thought, few-shot, and reasoning chain techniques. A/B testing frameworks for prompt variants. Guardrail systems that reduce hallucination rates and enforce output formats.

Fine-Tuning & Model Adaptation

LoRA, QLoRA, and full fine-tuning pipelines on domain-specific datasets. RLHF and DPO alignment workflows. Evaluation suites using Evals, RAGAS, and custom benchmark frameworks.

LLM Evaluation & Observability

Production monitoring stacks with LangSmith, Helicone, and custom evaluation loops. Automated regression testing for prompt changes. Cost-per-query optimization and model selection at scale.

LLM Technology Stack

Models: GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Llama 3, Mistral, Command R+

Frameworks: LangChain, LlamaIndex, Haystack, Semantic Kernel, CrewAI, AutoGen

Vector Databases: Pinecone, Weaviate, Qdrant, pgvector, Chroma

Fine-tuning: Hugging Face Transformers, Axolotl, Unsloth, OpenAI fine-tuning API

Evaluation: RAGAS, LangSmith, Weights & Biases, DeepEval, Braintrust

Infrastructure: AWS Bedrock, Azure OpenAI, GCP Vertex AI, vLLM, Ollama

Client Success Story: Legal AI Platform — 94% Reduction in Hallucination Rate

A Series B legal-tech startup had built an AI contract analysis tool where hallucinated clauses were appearing in summarized outputs — a critical failure in a regulated industry. Our prompt engineering team redesigned the RAG pipeline with a hierarchical chunking strategy, cross-encoder re-ranking, and a multi-step chain-of-thought reasoning prompt that cited source passages before drawing conclusions. Hallucination rate measured by a custom eval suite dropped from 11% to under 0.7%. The product launched to 40 enterprise law firm customers within 90 days of the engagement starting.

Client Success Story: E-Commerce AI Assistant — $4M ARR in Conversational Commerce

A mid-market e-commerce operator wanted an AI assistant that could guide shoppers through product selection, handle returns, and upsell complementary items — all via natural conversation. Our LLM specialists built a multi-agent system using function calling and a custom intent classification prompt layer that routed queries to specialized sub-agents. The assistant handled 68% of support interactions without human escalation and increased average order value by 23% through contextual product recommendations. The feature drove $4M in attributable ARR within its first year.

Why Companies Choose Our Prompt Engineers

  • Production-grade experience: Every specialist has shipped LLM applications to real users — not just built demos
  • Full-stack AI fluency: They understand embeddings, vector search, fine-tuning, and inference optimization — not just prompt templates
  • Evaluation-first mindset: They build eval suites before shipping, so you know when prompts degrade
  • 50% cost savings: Senior LLM expertise at a fraction of US market rates
  • Fast start: Most engagements begin within 1–2 weeks of your first call

Engagement Models

  • Individual LLM Specialist — One senior prompt engineer embedded in your AI team. Ideal for adding RAG expertise, evaluation rigor, or fine-tuning capability to a team that already has ML depth.
  • AI Application Pods (2–4 engineers) — LLM specialist paired with a backend engineer and ML ops in a coordinated squad. Common for teams building new AI products or scaling existing LLM pipelines.
  • Full LLM Teams (5–15+ engineers) — Complete squads for large-scale AI platform builds including prompt engineers, ML engineers, and AI infrastructure specialists.
  • Contract-to-Hire — Evaluate a specialist’s real output before committing long-term.

How To Vet Prompt Engineers & LLM Specialists

Our vetting identifies engineers who understand LLM behavior deeply — not just copy-paste prompt templates.

  1. Technical screening — LLM internals (attention mechanisms, tokenization, context windows, temperature/sampling), RAG architecture trade-offs, chunking strategies, embedding model selection, and fine-tuning approaches. Over 90% of applicants do not pass this stage.
  2. System design challenge — Design a production RAG system for a specific domain: legal, medical, financial. Evaluated on retrieval quality, hallucination mitigation, latency, and cost optimization.
  3. Live prompting session — Given a failing prompt and eval results, diagnose the failure mode and iterate to a working solution. Assessed on systematic debugging, not intuition.
  4. Communication screening — LLM specialists must explain model behavior and limitations to non-technical product teams. We assess this explicitly.

What to Look for When Hiring Prompt Engineers & LLM Specialists

Strong candidates understand why LLMs fail — not just how to make them work in demos.

What strong candidates demonstrate:

  • They discuss context window management, token budgeting, and chunking strategy trade-offs with specifics — not just “we used LangChain”
  • They’ve built and run evaluation suites using RAGAS, DeepEval, or custom frameworks — they know their hallucination and faithfulness numbers
  • They understand the difference between prompt engineering, fine-tuning, and RAG — and when each is the right solution
  • They’ve optimized for cost and latency at production scale — they know what a 10,000 query/day system actually costs to run

Red flags to watch for:

  • Equates “prompt engineering” with writing good instructions in plain English — has no systematic evaluation approach
  • Can’t explain why a RAG pipeline produces hallucinations or how to measure retrieval quality
  • Has only used LLMs via chat interfaces, not through APIs or production application code
  • No experience with production monitoring or observability for LLM applications

Interview questions that reveal real depth:

  • “Walk me through how you’d diagnose and fix a RAG system where 15% of answers contradict the retrieved context.”
  • “When would you choose fine-tuning over RAG for a domain-specific application? What data and infrastructure requirements change your decision?”
  • “How do you test that a prompt change hasn’t degraded performance on edge cases? Walk me through your evaluation workflow.”

Frequently Asked Questions

Which LLM providers and models do your specialists work with?
Our prompt engineers work across all major providers — OpenAI (GPT-4o, o1), Anthropic (Claude 3.5), Google (Gemini 1.5 Pro), Meta (Llama 3), Mistral, and Cohere (Command R+). They also have experience with self-hosted open-source models via vLLM and Ollama for cost-sensitive or data-privacy use cases. We match you with engineers whose provider experience matches your stack.
Can your LLM specialists work with our proprietary data and internal knowledge bases?
Yes. Building RAG systems over proprietary knowledge bases — internal documentation, product catalogs, legal contracts, customer data — is one of the most common engagements. Our specialists design secure, private pipelines that keep your data within your infrastructure and never expose it to third-party training.
Do your prompt engineers have experience with multi-agent systems?
Yes. Several of our specialists have built production multi-agent systems using CrewAI, AutoGen, LangGraph, and custom agent orchestration frameworks — including tool-calling agents, RAG agents, and hybrid human-in-the-loop workflows.
How quickly can a prompt engineer start?
Most LLM specialists can begin within 1–2 weeks. You interview and approve every candidate before any engagement starts.
  • AI Engineers & ML Engineers — Broader AI/ML engineering including model training, infrastructure, and deployment.
  • ML Engineers — Machine learning engineers who build and train the models your LLM applications build on.
  • MLOps Engineers — Infrastructure and deployment specialists who keep your LLM systems running reliably in production.
  • Data Engineers — Build the data pipelines and vector stores that power your RAG systems.

Want to Hire Remote Prompt Engineers & LLM Specialists?

We source, vet, and place senior prompt engineers and LLM specialists who’ve built and shipped production AI applications — engineers who understand evaluation, RAG architecture, and fine-tuning, not just prompting syntax. Whether you need one LLM specialist or a complete AI application team, we make it fast, affordable, and low-risk.

Get matched with LLM specialists →


Ready to hire prompt engineers who’ve shipped production AI? Contact us today and we’ll introduce you to senior LLM specialists within 48 hours.

Ready to Get Started?

Let's discuss how Hyperion360 can help scale your business with expert technical talent.